The Planning Report excerpts coverage of the Los Angeles City Council’s narrow vote to oppose Senate Bill 79, legislation by Sen. Scott Wiener that would override local land-use restrictions and allow denser housing near major transit stops. The contentious debate highlights ongoing tensions between state housing mandates and local control. The full original article: LA fights CA housing bill (LAist) by David Wagner

“Sacramento is hijacking local planning, stripping away neighborhood voices, ignoring safety and infrastructure, and handing the keys to corporate developers.” - Councilmember Traci Park
[Excerpt begins] In a close vote following a pointed debate, a slim majority of the Los Angeles City Council voted to formally oppose a California bill that aims to put more housing next to train stops and rapid bus lines. Eight council members voted to oppose Senate Bill 79, written by Sen. Scott Wiener of San Francisco. The bill would override local land-use restrictions and let developers construct apartment buildings up to six stories tall, as long as they are within a quarter-mile of a light rail station or a rapid bus stop.
Sacramento upzoning bills regularly have met resistance from local politicians in cities across California, including Los Angeles. In Tuesday’s council meeting, many L.A. council members again argued that state lawmakers were trying to wrest control from local leaders.
“Sacramento is hijacking local planning, stripping away neighborhood voices, ignoring safety and infrastructure, and handing the keys to corporate developers,” said Councilmember Traci Park, whose district includes the Pacific Palisades and who introduced the resolution to oppose SB 79 alongside Councilmember John Lee of the San Fernando Valley.
Joining Park and Lee in voting to oppose SB 79 were councilmembers Heather Hutt, Ysabel Jurado, Tim McOsker, Imelda Padilla, Monica Rodriguez, and Katy Yaroslavsky. Other council members said L.A.’s unaffordable rents and out-of-reach home prices prove new approaches are needed.
“We talk a lot about our housing crisis in this body, but our actions have not met the moment,” said Councilmember Nithya Raman, whose district stretches from Encino to Los Feliz. “The only times that they have met this moment are when Sacramento forces us to do something.”
Raman said she believes lack of housing growth currently is the city’s biggest problem. She noted that L.A.’s approval process for new housing regularly takes years, and the city recently has spent hundreds of thousands of dollars in legal fees in failed efforts to kill 100% affordable housing projects. Raman voted against opposing SB 79, along with councilmembers Eunisses Hernandez, Curren Price, Hugo Soto-Martinez, and Marqueece Harris-Dawson...
...Soto-Martinez, whose district includes much of Hollywood, as well as Silver Lake and Echo Park, had strong words for his colleagues who stood against the state bill.
“You can't have your cake and eat it, too,” Soto-Martinez said. “If you want the solution to these issues — the homelessness, permanent supportive housing sites — then build them in your district.”
The vote was not split entirely along ideological lines. Jurado — whose district includes Eagle Rock, El Sereno, and Boyle Heights and who frequently allies with Soto-Martinez, Raman, and Hernandez on tenant rights and other housing issues — expressed concern that upzoning could lead to the redevelopment of older, rent-controlled buildings.
“I'm not willing to gamble losing Boyle Heights,” Jurado said. “That's a gamble I don't want to take considering the lack of clarity around the issues of tenant protections, how it may or may not impact my district.”
...
*Disclaimer: This excerpt is provided for informational purposes. For full context, analysis, and updates, please refer to the original reporting by LAist.
- Log in to post comments